Qualitative Monitoring of the Arabic Media
On August 26 2008, I’lam launched its ‘Arabic Media Monitoring’ project with the release of the project’s first monitoring report on the Arabic media in Israel. This first report contained extracts of 16 violations of the ethical and professional codes, as found in I’lam’s ‘Media Charter’, in a number of Arabic newspapers and online news websites.
This Arabic Media Monitoring project builds on the success of ‘The Media Charter’, the code of ethics I’lam developed for the Arabic media and which was released in 2008.
In line with this project, a Steering Committee will be developed to monitor and advise the project and a supplement will be developed in each report that contains reactions to the preceding report. Some reports will concentrate on specific topics – for example, in a report to concentrate on racism, or on portrayals of women, and not on multiple categories every week. Letters will also be directed to editors to ask them for their opinions and reactions. A meeting will be scheduled every month with journalists after every six reports to discuss the project’s development and impact.
There are two reasons behind this monitoring of the Arabic media: 1) Prior to this project, I’lam focused on monitoring the Hebrew media and their coverage of Palestinians. This project signals a new attempt on the part of I’lam to focus constructive criticism towards our own Arabic media. 2) To shed light on ethical and professional violations by our own Arabic media so as to stress and encourage the imperatives of responsibility and professionalism in Arabic journalistic practice.
This monitoring project will produce 12 reports a year, one every month. The reports will monitor some of the following categories of violations:
1) Non-factual News These include news articles with absolutely no factual basis. See Articles 1, 3 and 5 of the Media Charter.
2) Inaccurate Information These are articles that contain various forms of inaccuracy. For example in referring to Jerusalem, it would be inaccurate to not reference the fact that East Jerusalem is recognised internationally as being occupied. See Articles 1, 3 and 5 of the Media Charter.
3) Plagiarism This is a violation of the ethical and professional practice of referencing the original creator or source of a news piece or photograph. See Article 15 of the Media Charter.
4) News without News Value This violation refers to those articles that shouldn’t be in the newspaper because they simply have no news value and are plain irrelevant. See Article 10 of the Media Charter.
5) Unprofessional Pictures The publication of this violation is so that newspaper owners recognise photography as an expertise. Therefore, not anybody in a newspaper house takes photographs for the paper, and understanding this has the added value of building a more professional news outlet. See Article 17 of the Media Charter.
6) Inaccurate Expressions and Language These encompass articles written with wrong expressions and an incorrect use of the Arabic language. See Articles 1, 3 and 5 of the Media Charter.
7) Readers Comments and Feedback on News Websites Although freedom of expression imposes the duty to publish public comments to articles, journalistic professionalism restricts readers’ comments of a certain type. I’lam monitors responses of the public on news websites that include sexist and chauvinistic comments, as well as comments with a racist tint that promote sectarianism and reinforce stereotypes and prejudice, as this is a violation of freedom of expression in that it inflicts personal harm or is in essence a discriminatory statement. See Article 7 of the Media Charter.
8) Propaganda The lack of critical reporting about political activists and political parties; therefore, this includes reporting claims by politicians about their achievements by relying solely on their press releases, rather than referring to other sources of information for a real investigation of the issue. Such reporting also tends to detract from the real story or issue at hand and instead focuses squarely on the politicians. See Articles 1, 3, 5 and 12 of the Media Charter.
9) Unverified Information These are articles that have not verified their facts with multiple sources. In fact, there is a tendency to allow anyone a platform to make statements which are then published, without verifying first the accuracy of those statements. See Articles 1, 3 and 5 of the Media Charter.
For upcoming reports, there is a possibility that further categories will be incorporated into the analysis. In every monitoring edition there are about 6-7 categories that are utilized.
We have sent the Arabic media monitoring reports to the entire electronic mailing list of I’lam, which include journalists, editors, media graduates, and media researchers. After sending it, until now, we have received scores of phone calls, most of them supportive of our work. Some were not satisfied about this new practice of internal criticism. Here we must mention that we have deleted the name of the newspaper and journalist so as not to shift focus onto individual newspaper houses or journalists, but to constructively criticize these instances of reporting that violate professional and ethical journalistic practice.
Although we do not expect particularly wide-ranging media coverage of this specific project, one hour of a Radio Shams programme was dedicated to the project’s initial report, and accordingly we received extensive exposure for this project.
As a way of developing this report, we have contacted journalists, who are also interested in bringing forth their own works and their colleagues works for inclusion in the monitoring report. Therefore I’lam is not the only source in the production of the report. We believe that after 4 reports, that the community itself, among them activists and various civil society members, will be sources for the monitoring report. This is important because it allows the community to build a culture of constructive and legitimate criticism of the media.
Click on the following link to download Monitoring Report 5 (Arabic).
Monthly Quantitative Monitoring of the Arabic Media
The quantitative reporting started on September 10 2008, looking at the 3 most popular commercial newspapers (Kul al-Arab, Al-Sunnara, Panorama). On September 26, another 3 commercial newspapers (Arab al-Dakhil, Hadith Al-Nass, El-3enwan Il-Raesi), not as popular, but dealing with more serious matter were monitored for the monthly report.
Accordingly, we now monitor six newspapers every month. Unlike the qualitative monitoring project which focuses on violations to professional and ethical codes of the media, the quantitative monitoring project takes a critical look at the media’s agenda, monitoring how much ‘infotainment’ makes up the newspaper, how much hard news versus soft news is present, and how many articles depend on passive coverage (dependant exclusively on press releases from authorities) as opposed to active coverage. Our initial data shows that 20 out of 50 news pieces, or 40% of articles, of the most popular newspapers are soft news focused.
This is a concern because it signifies a trend of the Arabic media to avoid pressing social and political phenomena, and in its place to report on trivial events.
I’lam also monitors Radio Shams’ morning news from 8-9am according to the same criteria. Currently, in the hourly news segment, 25 minutes is dedicated to commercials and music. This monitoring will be part of the monthly quantitative report. |